300+ Tools CoveredSource Data Updated Weeklydates

Tool intelligence profile

Windsurf (now Devin Desktop)

Now sold as Cognition's Devin Desktop: manage fleets of local and cloud agents from one surface, with a full IDE for reviewing what they ship.

Status source →
Type
AI Coding Assistant
Deployment
Cloud (managed)
Last updatedSeptember 21, 2026
AcquiredStatus confirmed

Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is now sold under new ownership

Cognition announced a definitive agreement to acquire Windsurf on 14 July 2025, covering its IP, product, trademark and brand. The editor is now sold as Devin Desktop and priced inside Cognition's Devin plans: windsurf.com redirects to devin.ai/desktop, and the Windsurf name no longer appears on the product or pricing pages.

Source

Editor's Take

We recommend Windsurf for developers seeking an AI-powered IDE that maintains flow without context-switching, particularly for small to mid-sized teams with budgets under $50/month, though its freemium model may limit scalability for larger organizations. Its cross-platform availability and focus on reducing interruptions make it a strong choice for solo developers or agile teams prioritizing productivity over advanced customization features found in tools like VS Code. We suggest pairing it with cloud-based collaboration tools for teams needing real-time code sharing.

— Egor Burlakov, Editor

Evaluate Windsurf (now Devin Desktop)

Comparisons

Windsurf (now Devin Desktop): product and architecture

This Windsurf review covers the product as it is sold today. Cognition announced its agreement to acquire Windsurf in July 2025, and the editor is now shipped as Devin Desktop: windsurf.com redirects to devin.ai/desktop, and the Windsurf name no longer appears on the product or pricing pages. What follows is based on Cognition's current product and pricing pages.

Overview

Devin Desktop is positioned as a control surface for coding agents rather than as an editor with AI bolted on. Cognition describes it as a way to "manage fleets of local and cloud agents from one surface" and to "plan, delegate, review, and ship without leaving your editor". The framing is that you decide what to build and the agents write the code.

That is a meaningful shift from what Windsurf was. Windsurf began as an AI-native IDE — a VS Code fork with an agentic assistant called Cascade at its centre — and competed as a better editor. Devin Desktop keeps a full IDE, with syntax highlighting, autocomplete and debugging built in, but the organising idea is now the session board: work in progress, work waiting for review, and work that is done, filtered by status, space, pull request or agent.

Cascade survives as one of several agents you can run rather than as the product's centre. Cognition lists Devin Local, Devin Cloud, Codex, Claude Agent, OpenCode and Cascade as agents available through its Agent Client Protocol, which is the mechanism for running different agents against the same workspace.

Cognition states over a million users and more than 4,000 enterprise customers across the Devin product line, and names Ramp, Harvey, NVIDIA, Modal and Intact Financial as customers of Devin Desktop specifically. Those are the vendor's own figures.

Key Features and Architecture

Agent fleet management. The session view is the core of the product: a board or list of everything your agents are doing, with pull request and CI state shown inline. Spaces group related sessions, so a piece of work spanning several agents and branches stays together.

A full IDE underneath. Cognition's claim is "the power of an IDE, exactly when you need it" — the editor exists so you can read, trace and debug what the agents shipped, rather than as the primary place you type. Syntax highlighting, autocomplete and debugging tools are built in.

Agent Client Protocol. Rather than binding to one model or one agent, Devin Desktop runs several through a common protocol. This is what allows Codex, Claude Agent, OpenCode and Cascade to sit alongside Cognition's own Devin Local and Devin Cloud agents.

Fast Context. Described as finding "the exact files and lines your agent needs — in milliseconds", this is the codebase retrieval layer that feeds an agent the relevant context. It is a paid-tier feature.

Cloud handoff. Work can be moved from a local agent to Devin Cloud, which Cognition markets as "the only IDE designed for you to close your laptop". Cloud agents are available from the Pro plan upward.

Extensions and MCP servers. The product extends through both language servers and MCP servers. Cognition lists rust-analyzer, gopls, clangd, Pyright, ESLint and Prettier alongside MCP integrations for Slack, Linear, Atlassian, Stripe, Vercel, Datadog and Sentry.

Ideal Use Cases

Teams running several agents at once. This is the product's stated centre of gravity, and the session board and Spaces only earn their place when there is more work in flight than one person can hold in mind. Ramp's quoted reason for adopting it is dispatching and monitoring "our array of agents from a single command center".

Engineers who want local permissions with managed agents. One named customer's reason is getting an agent experience with "the full permissions and flexibility of their local machines", which is the distinction between Devin Desktop and a purely cloud-hosted agent.

Work that needs review before it lands. The pull request and CI states in the session list, plus the built-in IDE for tracing a change, suit a workflow where agent output is inspected rather than merged on trust.

Individual developers on the free tier. Free includes unlimited Tab completions and inline edits with a light agent quota, which is enough to evaluate the editor without commitment.

It is a weaker fit if you want a conventional AI-assisted editor and no agent fleet: the interface is organised around delegation, and much of what you pay for above Free is quota and cloud capacity. Teams that need SSO, VPC deployment or teamspace isolation must reach Enterprise, since those are not available on Team at any seat count.

Strengths & Trade-offs

Strengths

  • Running several agents through one protocol avoids committing to a single vendor's agent, and Cascade, Codex, Claude Agent and OpenCode all work in the same workspace.
  • The session board with inline pull request and CI state is a genuine answer to the problem of tracking parallel agent work.
  • A real IDE is included for inspecting what agents produced, rather than only a diff view.
  • Local execution keeps your own machine's permissions, with an explicit path to hand work to the cloud.
  • The free tier includes unlimited Tab completions and inline edits.

Limitations

  • The Windsurf brand is being retired into Devin Desktop, so existing documentation, tutorials and community answers refer to a product name the vendor no longer uses.
  • Team pricing has two components, and the $80 platform fee is easy to miss when comparing headline seat prices.
  • Usage above the plan allowance is metered at API pricing with no published per-message rate, so costs are harder to forecast than a flat seat price.
  • SSO, VPC deployment and teamspace isolation require Enterprise, not Team.
  • Adoption figures, model performance claims and the "only IDE designed for you to close your laptop" positioning are Cognition's own and are not independently verified here.

Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) pricing

Starting at
Free tier · paid from $20/mo
Pricing model
Free tier
Free access
Free tier

View full Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) pricing intelligence →

Alternatives to Windsurf (now Devin Desktop)

The reviewed substitutes for Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) among the AI coding assistants, and what would make each one the better answer.

Direct alternatives

Reviewed substitutes: products bought for the same job, where a team picks one.

Cursor
Two products in the same class answering one purchase. Independent 2026 buyer's guides and vendor head-to-heads compare them directly, and a team adopts one, so the comparison is a substitution. Recorded against that external comparison content rather than against this site's own verdict, which is what the earlier derived approval rested on.Applies to: Choosing between two products of the same kind for one job.
Claude Code
Two AI coding assistants doing the same job inside a developer's editing workflow. They are compared directly on model quality, context handling and price, and a developer or team subscribes to one.Applies to: Choosing the AI coding assistant a developer or team will work in.

Other approaches

A different approach to the same problem. Each substitutes only for the workload named beside it.

Nativeline AI + Cloud
Create real native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps with AI. Nativeline builds actual SwiftUI — not web wrappers. Describe your idea, watch it build, ship to the App Store.Applies to: Having an application built largely by an agent. Windsurf stands in when the buyer wants the agent on their own machine and repository; Nativeline stands in when they want the build delivered as a managed service on Apple platforms.
Berth
Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is used rather than Berth for fleet-based AI coding and pull-request review workflows. We recommend it over Berth when an engineering organization needs coordinated agent work and code-review visibility, while accepting that its supplied feature set does not establish Berth-style self-hosted deployment, cron scheduling, or remote runtime operations.
See detailed alternatives analysis

Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) alternatives deserve evaluation by product role, architecture, pricing, public adoption signals, and operational trade-offs—not category proximity alone. Devin Desktop is a command center for local and cloud coding agents, including a session board for pull request and CI state plus an IDE for reviewing and debugging agent output. For data engineers and analytics teams, the central question is whether that multi-agent coordination model improves delivery more than a focused AI IDE, terminal agent, or deployment-oriented runtime. The best choice depends on where code is written, reviewed, executed, and handed off.

Top Alternatives Overview

Cursor

Cursor is an AI-native IDE and code editor centered on autocomplete and agentic coding. Its specialized Tab model predicts the next action, while agents can take on implementation tasks; Cursor also extends beyond the editor with GitHub pull-request reviews, Slack collaboration, and terminal access. Compared with Windsurf (now Devin Desktop), Cursor emphasizes a single developer’s AI-assisted build loop across several work surfaces rather than Devin Desktop’s shared Spaces, Git worktrees, and command-center model for dispatching and monitoring multiple agents. Its listed user rating is 9.5/10 from 45 reviews, which is a useful public signal but not a substitute for testing the workflow against your repositories. Choose this if your team wants an AI IDE with GitHub, Slack, and terminal touchpoints, and does not need Devin Desktop’s central session board for coordinating local and cloud agents.

Berth

Berth is an open-source deployment and runtime product: AI writes the code, while Berth runs and deploys it to a Mac or Linux server without Docker, YAML, or configuration files. Its differentiators are operational: runtime detection for Python, Node, Go, Rust, and Shell; a single Rust binary for remote agents; persistent execution; cron scheduling; and live log streaming with ANSI support and 10,000 lines of scrollback. It also exposes 17 JSON-RPC MCP tools, allowing Claude Code to deploy, monitor, and manage code programmatically. Against Windsurf (now Devin Desktop), Berth is not an IDE or a multi-agent desktop control plane; it addresses the execution and deployment side after code has been produced. Choose this if your practical bottleneck is getting agent-produced services onto Macs or Linux servers and operating them afterward, rather than reviewing agent diffs in a full IDE.

Claude Code

Claude Code is an agentic coding tool available in the terminal, IDE, desktop app, and browser. It reads codebases, edits files, runs commands, and integrates with development workflows, making it a flexible choice for engineers who want the same agent-oriented capability across interfaces. The key difference from Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is that Devin Desktop concentrates agent dispatch, context sharing, Git worktrees, and review in a dedicated shared workspace, while Claude Code is defined by its availability across multiple interaction surfaces. Claude Code also has a free tier with limited use and a bring-your-own API-key option, alongside paid plans and token-based API access. Choose this if your team values terminal-first work or needs to move between terminal, IDE, desktop, and browser without adopting Devin Desktop as the primary agent-management surface.

Architecture and Approach Comparison

Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is organized around coordinated agent work. Spaces share context and Git worktrees across agents, while the platform brings local and cloud agents into one command center. Its session board surfaces pull request and CI state, and its built-in IDE is intended for reading, debugging, and rapidly or deeply reviewing agent changes before pushing. Features such as Fast Context, which finds relevant files and lines in milliseconds, and cloud handoff when closing a laptop reinforce an architecture designed for continuity across agent sessions.

Cursor takes a more IDE-centered approach. It combines autocomplete, an always-on multi-line suggestion model, coding agents, GitHub pull-request review, Slack collaboration, and terminal work. For an analytics engineer iterating within one repository, this tighter editor workflow can be preferable to a central agent fleet view. We recommend Cursor over Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) when individual engineers need AI assistance embedded in day-to-day editing and code review; Devin Desktop works better when several agent tasks must share context and be monitored together.

Claude Code is interface-flexible rather than desktop-control-plane-first: terminal, IDE, desktop app, and browser are all supported. That makes it the stronger fit for teams with terminal-heavy engineering habits or varied local development environments. Berth has the most distinct architecture: it is a runtime and deployment layer with remote agents, a NATS relay that works behind NAT without opening ports, scheduling, and live logs. It is the better fit when execution and operations are the constraint; it does not replace the review and multi-agent workspace features of Windsurf (now Devin Desktop).

Pricing Comparison

Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) uses a freemium model with usage-based overage purchased at API pricing. Its authoritative pricing record identifies a Free plan at $0 with a light quota and unlimited Tab completions, Pro at $20/month, Max at $200/month, and Team at $80/month plus $40/month per full developer seat. Free SWE-1.7 access is listed as unlimited, while plan allowances refresh daily and weekly. Team and Enterprise plans add collaboration and administrative capabilities, with Enterprise pricing custom and including options such as SAML/OIDC SSO and VPC deployment.

ToolPricing modelKnown pricing from supplied data
Windsurf (now Devin Desktop)Freemium; usage-based overageFree $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Team $80/month plus $40/month per full developer seat; Enterprise custom
CursorUsage-basedFrom $20/month; Business plans include $40/user, $20/month, $60/month, and $200/month amounts
BerthEnterpriseContact for pricing
Claude CodeUsage-basedFree tier with limited use and BYO API key; Pro $20/month; Max $100/month; Max 5x $200/month; Team $25/user/month; Enterprise custom; API pay per token

For a solo evaluator, Cursor and Devin Desktop both have stated entry pricing from $20/month, but their value is delivered differently: Cursor through its AI IDE workflow and Devin Desktop through agent coordination, cloud work, and review. For teams, Devin Desktop’s $80/month Team charge plus $40/month per full user should be evaluated against its shared workspace and centralized management features. Berth requires a direct commercial conversation, so it should be assessed on deployment requirements rather than assumed price parity.

When to Consider Switching

Consider moving from Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) when its agent-fleet management model is not the constraint in your delivery process. If engineers mainly want continuously available, multi-line autocomplete and AI help inside an editor, Cursor is the more focused choice. Its GitHub pull-request review, Slack collaboration, and terminal presence also suit teams that want AI assistance to meet them in existing engineering surfaces rather than consolidating activity into Devin Desktop.

Choose Claude Code when terminal-driven development is central, or when engineers need one agentic tool across terminal, IDE, desktop, and browser. Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) provides a built-in IDE and supports handoff between local and cloud work, but its differentiated value is coordination through Spaces, shared Git worktrees, and a session board. Teams that do not need those shared-control features are paying for a broader operating model than they require.

Berth is appropriate when the weakness is downstream execution: deploying generated code, retaining remote execution, scheduling work, or viewing logs. Devin Desktop’s supplied capabilities emphasize code context, agent dispatch, CI and pull-request state, and review; the supplied data does not identify runtime detection, cron scheduling, remote Linux execution, or log streaming as Devin Desktop features. For teams that need those operational functions, we recommend Berth as a complementary runtime-focused option rather than treating it as a direct IDE replacement.

Migration Considerations

Moving away from Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is principally a workflow migration, not a database migration. The supplied product information does not establish SQL dialect compatibility, data-format conversion, or database connector behavior for any of these tools. Teams should therefore avoid framing the decision as a SQL or file-format compatibility exercise unless they have separately verified those requirements in their own repositories and deployment environments.

The real complexity lies in preserving how work moves through the engineering system. Inventory Devin Desktop Spaces, shared context, Git worktrees, active local or cloud agent sessions, pull-request and CI review practices, and any use of Fast Context or the built-in IDE for approving diffs. Cursor migrations should validate editor workflows, agent task handoffs, GitHub review, Slack collaboration, and terminal usage. Claude Code migrations should define which teams will use terminal, IDE, desktop, or browser interfaces and how command-running permissions are governed.

For Berth, plan around the operational surface: supported runtime detection inputs such as requirements.txt, package.json, go.mod, and Cargo.toml; Linux-server placement; remote-agent connectivity; cron schedules; MCP-based management; and log-retention expectations. The most difficult transitions are those that change both coding behavior and deployment ownership at once. We recommend separating those decisions: first establish the preferred code-generation and review workflow, then decide whether deployment runtime capabilities require Berth alongside it.

Public signals

About these signals

Verified factual signals from public sources. They indicate observable activity or interest, not total adoption, product quality, or cost.

Top 77% Google Trends search interest63 Product Hunt comments

See all signals from 2 sources
Source
Signals
Last updated
Google Trends
Search interest:Top 77%overallTop 85%in Developer Tools
September 21, 2026
Product Hunt
Comments:63Rating:4.7/5Reviews:68Votes:353
September 21, 2026
Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) product dashboard and interface

Frequently asked questions

Is Windsurf still available?

Yes, but not under that name. Cognition announced its agreement to acquire Windsurf in July 2025 and now ships the editor as Devin Desktop. windsurf.com redirects to devin.ai/desktop, and the Windsurf name no longer appears on the product or pricing pages.

Who owns Windsurf now?

Cognition, the company behind the Devin coding agent. Its announcement of 14 July 2025 covered Windsurf's IP, product, trademark and brand.

What happened to Cascade?

Cascade still exists, but as one of several agents rather than the centre of the product. Cognition lists Devin Local, Devin Cloud, Codex, Claude Agent, OpenCode and Cascade as agents available through its Agent Client Protocol.

How much does Devin Desktop cost?

Free is $0, Pro is $20 per month and Max is $200 per month. Team is $80 per month for the team plus $40 per month per full developer seat, so five full seats cost $280 per month. Enterprise is quote-only.

Is Devin Desktop open source?

No. It is a proprietary product from Cognition, with a free tier but no open-source edition.

Related AI Coding Assistants

Other AI coding assistants in the catalog. Same kind of product, not a substitution recommendation.