Buying snapshot
Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.
| Decision point | What Devin states |
|---|---|
Deployment | Desktop IDE for Mac (minimum OS X Yosemite), Windows (minimum Windows 10) and Linux (tar, deb or rpm; glibc >= 2.28, glibcxx >= 3.4.25). |
Linux updates | The tarball does not update itself; the deb and rpm repositories deliver new releases through your package manager. |
Where the agent runs | Devin Local runs on your machine as the primary local agent and shares its agent harness with Devin CLI. |
Remote work | Open a project, clone a repository, connect via SSH, or connect to a local dev container. |
Support | Discord for support, feature requests and bug reports; priority support on Teams; highest priority support and dedicated account management on Enterprise. |
Our take
Devin Desktop suits developers who want to hand tasks to an agent inside their editor and can accept a bill shaped by usage allowances. If you mainly want completions, test it on Free first and pay only once the agent quota or model choice becomes the limit.
Evaluate Windsurf (now Devin Desktop)
Comparisons
Where it stands out
Model choice without separate accounts. Pro brings frontier models from several providers and open source models into one subscription, so you can switch to smaller models for routine tasks to stretch the allowance.
Easy switch from VS Code or Cursor. You can import VS Code or Cursor settings during onboarding or later from the command palette.
Agent customisation. MCP servers extend the agent, Rules and AGENTS.md files shape how it behaves, and Workflows automate repetitive trajectories.
Early access channel. Devin Desktop Next is an opt-in prerelease; features typically reach it first and then the stable release shortly after.
Product screenshot
Trade-offs to weigh
Hard-to-forecast overage. Cost per message varies with the model, the task size and complexity, and the reasoning required, so heavy agent use past your allowance is billed by usage, not a flat fee.
No marketplace installs. You cannot install extensions through any marketplace, and other AI code completion extensions and proprietary extensions are incompatible, so check your current extensions before moving.
Windsurf names remain. The Linux repository URLs still use the pre-rebrand windsurf naming, older Windows installs may sit in a Windsurf folder, and configuration lives in ~/.codeium/windsurf. Existing Linux installs keep updating: on deb through a transitional windsurf package, on rpm because devin-desktop provides windsurf.
Pricing and plan conditions
Each paid plan comes with a usage allowance that refreshes automatically on a daily and weekly basis. If you go beyond the included usage on a paid plan, you can purchase extra usage, which is consumed at API pricing. Teams is billed in two parts: the $80/month team plan fee plus $40/mo for each full dev seat, and each full user gets their own quota and access to Devin Desktop. For example, a team with five full dev seats pays the $80 team fee plus five $40 seat fees each month, before any extra usage bought at API pricing.
Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.
| Plan | Published price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
Free | $0/month | One member; light agent quota, limited model availability, unlimited inline edits and Tab completions. |
Pro | $20/month | Everything in Free, plus increased quotas, full model availability, free use of SWE-2, Devin Cloud access and extra usage at API pricing. |
Max | $200/month | Everything in Pro, plus significantly higher quotas, for power users. |
Teams | $80/month for team plan + $40/mo per full dev seat | Everything in Pro, plus up to 200 users, sharing and collaboration, centralized billing, an admin dashboard with analytics and priority support. |
Enterprise | Let's talk | SAML/OIDC SSO, centralized enterprise admin controls, a dedicated deployment option and first class support for every major model provider. |
Public signals
About these signals
Verified factual signals from public sources. They indicate observable activity or interest, not total adoption, product quality, or cost.
Top 100% Google Trends search interest63 Product Hunt comments
See all signals from 2 sources
Alternatives to Windsurf (now Devin Desktop)
The reviewed substitutes for Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) among the AI coding assistants, and what would make each one the better answer.
Direct alternatives
Reviewed substitutes: products bought for the same job, where a team picks one.
- Cursor
- Cursor and Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) are AI-powered coding environments in which developers write code and hand changes to AI agents. Cursor is an AI code editor known for multi-line autocomplete that predicts the next edit, while Devin Desktop, now part of Cognition's Devin platform, puts the weight on managing local and cloud coding agents from one surface, with a built-in IDE for checking their work.Applies to: Choosing between two products of the same kind for one job.
- Claude Code
- Two AI coding assistants doing the same job inside a developer's editing workflow. They are compared directly on model quality, context handling and price, and a developer or team subscribes to one.Applies to: Choosing the AI coding assistant a developer or team will work in.
Other approaches
A different approach to the same problem. Each substitutes only for the workload named beside it.
- Nativeline AI + Cloud
- Create real native iPhone, iPad, and Mac apps with AI. Nativeline builds actual SwiftUI, not web wrappers. Describe your idea, watch it build, ship to the App Store.Applies to: Having an application built largely by an agent. Windsurf stands in when the buyer wants the agent on their own machine and repository; Nativeline stands in when they want the build delivered as a managed service on Apple platforms.
See detailed alternatives analysis
Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) alternatives deserve evaluation by product role, architecture, pricing, public adoption signals, and operational trade-offs—not category proximity alone. Devin Desktop is a command center for local and cloud coding agents, including a session board for pull request and CI state plus an IDE for reviewing and debugging agent output. For data engineers and analytics teams, the central question is whether that multi-agent coordination model improves delivery more than a focused AI IDE, terminal agent, or deployment-oriented runtime. The best choice depends on where code is written, reviewed, executed, and handed off.
Top Alternatives Overview
Cursor
Cursor is an AI-native IDE and code editor centered on autocomplete and agentic coding. Its specialized Tab model predicts the next action, while agents can take on implementation tasks; Cursor also extends beyond the editor with GitHub pull-request reviews, Slack collaboration, and terminal access. Compared with Windsurf (now Devin Desktop), Cursor emphasizes a single developer’s AI-assisted build loop across several work surfaces rather than Devin Desktop’s shared Spaces, Git worktrees, and command-center model for dispatching and monitoring multiple agents. Its listed user rating is 9.5/10 from 45 reviews, which is a useful public signal but not a substitute for testing the workflow against your repositories. Choose this if your team wants an AI IDE with GitHub, Slack, and terminal touchpoints, and does not need Devin Desktop’s central session board for coordinating local and cloud agents.
Claude Code
Claude Code is an agentic coding tool available in the terminal, IDE, desktop app, and browser. It reads codebases, edits files, runs commands, and integrates with development workflows, making it a flexible choice for engineers who want the same agent-oriented capability across interfaces. The key difference from Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is that Devin Desktop concentrates agent dispatch, context sharing, Git worktrees, and review in a dedicated shared workspace, while Claude Code is defined by its availability across multiple interaction surfaces. Claude Code also has a free tier with limited use and a bring-your-own API-key option, alongside paid plans and token-based API access. Choose this if your team values terminal-first work or needs to move between terminal, IDE, desktop, and browser without adopting Devin Desktop as the primary agent-management surface.
Architecture and Approach Comparison
Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is organized around coordinated agent work. Spaces share context and Git worktrees across agents, while the platform brings local and cloud agents into one command center. Its session board surfaces pull request and CI state, and its built-in IDE is intended for reading, debugging, and rapidly or deeply reviewing agent changes before pushing. Features such as Fast Context, which finds relevant files and lines in milliseconds, and cloud handoff when closing a laptop reinforce an architecture designed for continuity across agent sessions.
Cursor takes a more IDE-centered approach. It combines autocomplete, an always-on multi-line suggestion model, coding agents, GitHub pull-request review, Slack collaboration, and terminal work. For an analytics engineer iterating within one repository, this tighter editor workflow can be preferable to a central agent fleet view. We recommend Cursor over Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) when individual engineers need AI assistance embedded in day-to-day editing and code review; Devin Desktop works better when several agent tasks must share context and be monitored together.
Claude Code is interface-flexible rather than desktop-control-plane-first: terminal, IDE, desktop app, and browser are all supported. That makes it the stronger fit for teams with terminal-heavy engineering habits or varied local development environments.
Pricing Comparison
Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) uses a freemium model with usage-based overage purchased at API pricing. Devin lists a Free plan at $0 with a light quota and unlimited Tab completions, Pro at $20/month, Max at $200/month, and Team at $80/month plus $40/month per full developer seat for up to 200 users. Pro includes free use of SWE-2, and plan allowances refresh daily and weekly. Team and Enterprise plans add collaboration and administrative capabilities, with Enterprise pricing custom and including options such as SAML/OIDC SSO and VPC deployment.
Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.
| Tool | Pricing model | Known pricing from the public documentation |
|---|---|---|
| Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) | Freemium; usage-based overage | Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Team $80/month plus $40/month per full developer seat; Enterprise custom |
| Cursor | Usage-based | From $20/month; Business plans include $40/user, $20/month, $60/month, and $200/month amounts |
| Claude Code | Usage-based | Free tier with limited use and BYO API key; Pro $20/month; Max $100/month; Max 5x $200/month; Team $25/user/month; Enterprise custom; API pay per token |
For a solo evaluator, Cursor and Devin Desktop both have stated entry pricing from $20/month, but their value is delivered differently: Cursor through its AI IDE workflow and Devin Desktop through agent coordination, cloud work, and review. For teams, Devin Desktop’s $80/month Team charge plus $40/month per full user should be evaluated against its shared workspace and centralized management features.
When to Consider Switching
Consider moving from Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) when its agent-fleet management model is not the constraint in your delivery process. If engineers mainly want continuously available, multi-line autocomplete and AI help inside an editor, Cursor is the more focused choice. Its GitHub pull-request review, Slack collaboration, and terminal presence also suit teams that want AI assistance to meet them in existing engineering surfaces rather than consolidating activity into Devin Desktop.
Choose Claude Code when terminal-driven development is central, or when engineers need one agentic tool across terminal, IDE, desktop, and browser. Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) provides a built-in IDE and supports handoff between local and cloud work, but its differentiated value is coordination through Spaces, shared Git worktrees, and a session board. Teams that do not need those shared-control features are paying for a broader operating model than they require.
Migration Considerations
Moving away from Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) is principally a workflow migration, not a database migration. The public documentation does not establish SQL dialect compatibility, data-format conversion, or database connector behavior for any of these tools. Teams should therefore avoid framing the decision as a SQL or file-format compatibility exercise unless they have separately verified those requirements in their own repositories and deployment environments.
The real complexity lies in preserving how work moves through the engineering system. Inventory Devin Desktop Spaces, shared context, Git worktrees, active local or cloud agent sessions, pull-request and CI review practices, and any use of Fast Context or the built-in IDE for approving diffs. Cursor migrations should validate editor workflows, agent task handoffs, GitHub review, Slack collaboration, and terminal usage. Claude Code migrations should define which teams will use terminal, IDE, desktop, or browser interfaces and how command-running permissions are governed.