Buying snapshot
Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.
| Decision point | What Anthropic states |
|---|---|
How you get access | A Claude Pro or Max plan, a Team or Enterprise plan, or a Claude Console account. With a Console account, Claude Code uses API tokens at standard API pricing. |
Third-party model providers | Most surfaces need a Claude subscription or an Anthropic Console account. The Terminal CLI, VS Code and JetBrains also support third-party providers. |
Where it runs | Terminal, VS Code (and Cursor), JetBrains IDEs, a desktop app, the web, the Claude app for iOS and Android, and Slack. It is available for macOS, Linux and Windows. |
Installation | Native installer (recommended) for macOS, Linux, WSL and Windows, plus Homebrew, WinGet, apt, dnf and apk. Native installs update in the background. Installation via npm is deprecated. |
Where your code goes | In the terminal, Claude Code runs locally and talks directly to model APIs, without a backend server or remote code index. It asks for permission before it changes files or runs commands. |
Feedback data | Anthropic collects feedback, including usage data such as code acceptance or rejections, the related conversation data, and reports sent with /bug. It states limited retention for sensitive information and policies against using feedback for model training. |
Our take
Choose Claude Code if you want to hand off whole tasks, such as a bug fix, a test suite or a migration, and review the result, rather than get help line by line. It fits best when your team will invest in CLAUDE.md files, skills and hooks so the agent follows your own rules. If you need predictable spend, compare a subscription seat with token billing through a Console account before you roll it out.
Evaluate Claude Code
Comparisons
Where it stands out
Works through the whole task. Anthropic says Claude Code plans the approach, writes code across multiple files and checks that it works. It can stage changes, write commit messages, create branches and open pull requests.
Follows your project rules. It reads a CLAUDE.md file at the start of every session, and can read an existing AGENTS.md instead. Skills package repeatable workflows for a team, and hooks run shell commands before or after its actions, such as formatting after each edit.
Connects to other tools. Through MCP servers it can read design docs in Google Drive, update Jira tickets or pull data from Slack. Each surface uses the same engine, so CLAUDE.md files, settings and MCP servers carry across all of them.
Runs without you at the keyboard. The CLI can be piped and scripted with
claude -p, and GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD can automate code review and issue triage. Routines run in the cloud on a schedule, keep running when your computer is off, and can trigger on API calls or GitHub events.Parallel work. Several agents can work on parts of one task while a lead agent merges the results, and background agents let you watch several sessions from one screen. The Agent SDK lets you build your own agents on Claude Code's tools.
Product screenshot
Trade-offs to weigh
Subscriptions have usage limits. Anthropic states that usage limits apply, so a seat does not mean unmetered use for heavy users.
Not every surface is self-contained. The JetBrains plugin needs the CLI installed separately. The desktop app requires a paid subscription, and on Ubuntu or Debian it is in beta. Moving a session with
claude --teleportor/desktoprequires a claude.ai subscription.Package-manager installs need manual updates. Homebrew and WinGet installs do not update themselves. The Homebrew
claude-codecask follows the stable channel, which is typically about a week behind.Fast mode costs more per token. Fast mode for Opus 5.5 gives lower-latency responses at a higher cost per token. On Claude Code it is in research preview at $8/$40 per million tokens, and subscription users pay for it with usage credits.
Some newer features are early or plan-bound. Self-hosted environments, which run sessions on your own infrastructure, were in public beta as of Aug 6, 2026. Code Review became generally available for Team and Enterprise on Oct 15, 2026.
Pricing and plan conditions
Team is priced per seat, so the bill grows with each person you add. Prices shown do not include applicable tax, and Anthropic says price and plans are subject to change at its discretion.
Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.
| Plan | Published price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
Team | $20 per seat / month if billed annually | For teams of 2 to 150. Claude Code for every seat, self-serve seat management, and up to $500 per month in pooled API credits. |
Enterprise | Learn more on the Claude Code product page | Everything in Team, plus Claude Security, usage and ROI analytics, role-based access, spend limits, and custom data controls. |
Public signals
About these signals
Verified factual signals from public sources. They indicate observable activity or interest, not total adoption, product quality, or cost.
245 GitHub commits 90d155.1k GitHub stars0 vulnerabilities across 2 packages
See all signals from 7 sources
npm · @anthropic-ai/claude-code@2.1.319 · PyPI · claude-agent-sdk@0.2.179
Alternatives to Claude Code
The reviewed substitutes for Claude Code among the AI coding assistants, and what would make each one the better answer.
Direct alternatives
Reviewed substitutes: products bought for the same job, where a team picks one.
- Cursor
- Cursor and Claude Code are AI coding tools that read a codebase, edit files across a project and help build features or fix bugs. Cursor is an AI code editor with always-on autocomplete that predicts the next edit, while Claude Code, from Anthropic, is an agentic tool that works from the terminal, an IDE, a desktop app or the browser and runs commands itself.Applies to: Choosing between two products of the same kind for one job.
- Windsurf (now Devin Desktop)
- Two AI coding assistants doing the same job inside a developer's editing workflow. They are compared directly on model quality, context handling and price, and a developer or team subscribes to one.Applies to: Choosing the AI coding assistant a developer or team will work in.
Other approaches
A different approach to the same problem. Each substitutes only for the workload named beside it.
- Nativeline AI + Cloud
- Claude Code can scaffold and iterate a full SwiftUI project from prompts, which covers the build half of what Nativeline sells as a service. The fork is who operates it: Claude Code is a tool the buyer drives in their own terminal against their own repository; Nativeline is a managed cloud that runs the loop for them.