Buying snapshot
Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.
| Decision point | What Vibio states |
|---|---|
Scan types | URL scan with no repo access, or a GitHub repo scan for full codebase analysis |
Code access | Read-only GitHub permissions; Vibio says it never modifies files, pushes commits or changes your infrastructure |
Code storage | Code sits in a temporary workspace that is deleted after the scan; scan results (findings, fix packs, artifacts) are stored, source code is not |
Supported stack | Next.js (App Router and Pages Router), NestJS, Express and Fastify; TypeScript and JavaScript; aware of Supabase auth, Prisma/Drizzle and Stripe webhook patterns |
Our take
Vibio fits a solo builder or small team shipping a TypeScript or JavaScript web app who wants a repeatable pre-launch audit with a fix order, bought as a one-time scan or a small monthly scan allowance. If you need a full security programme beyond app and code checks, it covers only one part of that job.
Evaluate Vibio
Where it stands out
Rules first, AI second. Vibio runs 50+ rule-based checks, and each finding includes the file path, line number and code snippet. AI then agrees or disagrees with each finding, adjusts severity and sweeps for deeper issues such as auth logic flaws and error handling gaps. Vibio calls the AI layer "a second layer, not the source of truth", so the same code should give a repeatable baseline.
A start without source access. The URL scan makes standard HTTP requests to your public endpoints and checks security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), exposed keys or secrets in responses, rate limiting, CORS and basic auth surfaces. You can review a running app before deciding to connect a repo.
A fix order, not a flat list. Findings are grouped into Fix Packs ordered by severity, so critical issues come first. Each pack covers a cluster of related findings with step-by-step guidance and Cursor prompts.
Production-readiness, not only security. Repo checks also cover CI/CD steps, tsconfig strictness, test presence, structured logging and error monitoring, database migrations and unscoped queries, and lockfile hygiene. For Supabase apps, Vibio says it flags missing RLS policies and exposed service role keys.
Trade-offs to weigh
Outside the named frameworks, test first. Vibio tailors its checks and fix packs to the stack it detects. If your framework is not one it names, run a single scan before you subscribe.
The deepest results need repo access. A URL-only scan stays on the external surface of your app. Teams that cannot connect a GitHub repo give up the rule-based code checks and the AI deep review.
App and code scope. Vibio's check list covers application code, CI, dependencies and public endpoints. Treat it as an app-level audit that sits inside a wider security review, not as that review.
Pricing and plan conditions
Vibio sells either one scan for a one-time payment or a monthly subscription with a fixed scan allowance. The one-time Full scan suits a single pre-launch audit; a subscription suits teams that rescan on a schedule. Support moves from standard to priority only on the 20-scan plan.
Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.
| Plan | Published price | What it adds |
|---|---|---|
Full scan | £4.99 one-time payment | 1 comprehensive scan, full security report, AI-assisted findings, standard support |
Subscription (4 scans/month) | £9.99/mo (£2.50 per scan) | 4 scans per month, full security reports, AI-assisted findings, standard support |
Subscription (20 scans/month) | £39.99/mo (£2.00 per scan) | 20 scans per month, full security reports, AI-assisted findings, priority support |
Public signals
About these signals
Verified factual signals from public sources. They indicate observable activity or interest, not total adoption, product quality, or cost.
1 Product Hunt comments0 Product Hunt reviews
See all signals from 1 source
Alternatives to Vibio
The reviewed substitutes for Vibio among the code security, and what would make each one the better answer.
Direct alternatives
Reviewed substitutes: products bought for the same job, where a team picks one.
- CodeWatchdog
- Choose CodeWatchdog if you want human-reviewed security audits layered on top of AI scanning, especially for AI-generated codebases where automated tools alone miss subtle logic flaws.Applies to: Finding security defects in your own source before release. Either stands in for the other as the scanner in the pipeline; the choice is on language coverage, false-positive rate and how findings reach the developer.
Other approaches
A different approach to the same problem. Each substitutes only for the workload named beside it.
- Snyk
- Snyk is the established platform for the same scanning job, covering code, dependencies, containers and infrastructure as code with an enterprise reporting and policy layer. Vibio is the focused newer entrant on source scanning alone. Conditional rather than direct, and this is the demotion of 2026-09-10 answered rather than reversed: the pair is not equal in scope, so the substitution holds only where source scanning is the whole requirement.Applies to: Catching vulnerabilities in first-party code. Vibio stands in for Snyk when source scanning is all that is needed and the budget is small; Snyk stands in when dependencies, containers and IaC must be covered under one policy and reporting layer.
See detailed alternatives analysis
Looking for Vibio alternatives? Vibio runs 50+ deterministic security checks against your URL or GitHub repository, catching vulnerabilities like missing auth middleware, input validation gaps, and hardcoded secrets in JavaScript and TypeScript codebases. It targets teams shipping with AI assistants like Cursor and Copilot, where production gaps hide in auto-generated code. But Vibio focuses narrowly on web app production-readiness audits, supports only JS/TS frameworks (Next.js, NestJS, Express, Fastify), and its AI deep review layer sits behind deterministic rules rather than leading the analysis. If you need broader language coverage, runtime protection, or security operations beyond static code scanning, these alternatives fill the gaps Vibio leaves open.
Top Alternatives Overview
CodeWatchdog combines Claude-powered AI scanning with senior engineer audits to catch logic errors, access control gaps, and anti-patterns that LLMs consistently produce. It delivers a 0-100 security score with severity ratings and a PDF report containing specific fixes. An AI Deep Scan costs $20 per scan, and a Senior Dev Review starts at $499. No account required, no code stored, and crypto payments accepted. Choose CodeWatchdog if you want human-reviewed security audits layered on top of AI scanning, especially for AI-generated codebases where automated tools alone miss subtle logic flaws.
Flarehawk is an autonomous security operations platform that ingests Cloudflare telemetry in real time, builds a customer-specific security graph connecting requests, identities, and changes, then spins up AI investigation agents that analyze events in context. It generates one-click remediation plans with 5-year log retention on enterprise tiers. Flarehawk has a free plan; paid plans start at $749/month for Detect (10 investigations, 250 GB ingest, 30-day retention) and $1,499/month for Investigate (50 investigations, 500 GB, 1-year retention). Choose Flarehawk if your security needs extend beyond code scanning into real-time threat detection, incident investigation, and operational remediation across cloud infrastructure.
PromptBrake stress-tests LLM endpoints with 138 checks across 18 attack categories, covering prompt injection, data leaks, tool misuse, policy bypasses, and output sanitization. Each scan returns clear PASS/WARN/FAIL verdicts with evidence logs showing the exact attack prompt and endpoint response. Its single Enterprise plan is $499/month for 30 scans per billing period, with CI/CD release gates and export capabilities. Choose PromptBrake if you run AI-powered features and need to validate that your LLM endpoints resist manipulation before each deployment.
EarlyCore scans AI agents for prompt injection, data leakage, and jailbreaks before they ship, then monitors them in real time in production. It works with AWS Bedrock, Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform (formerly Vertex AI), and custom stacks, with a 15-minute setup time. Pricing is enterprise-level (contact for details). Choose EarlyCore if you deploy autonomous AI agents and need continuous runtime monitoring alongside pre-deployment security scanning rather than one-time code audits.
Ethicore Engine Guardian SDK is the first pip-installable AI threat protection layer for Python. Drop it in front of any LLM (OpenAI, Anthropic, Ollama) to block prompt injection, jailbreaks, and role hijacking before requests reach the model. It uses three defense layers: pattern matching, offline ONNX semantic embeddings, and ML behavioral inference with zero cloud dependency and no latency overhead. The free community edition is on PyPI; the licensed tier adds a 30-category threat library and production models. Choose Ethicore if you need an embeddable, dependency-free security layer that runs locally inside your Python application stack.
DefenceNet is an AI-powered phishing protection platform that analyzes URLs in real time using machine learning to detect sophisticated zero-day attacks across SMS, email, and web channels. Unlike traditional blacklist-based tools, it blocks malicious links before users click them. Built by Datacove.ai, it targets SMBs and enterprises with enterprise-level pricing. Choose DefenceNet if your security priority is protecting end users from phishing and scam links at the network level rather than scanning application source code.
Architecture and Approach Comparison
Vibio takes a deterministic-first approach: 50+ rule-based checks scan your codebase for concrete, provable issues, each backed by file path, line number, and code snippet evidence. AI validates every deterministic finding (agreeing, disagreeing, adjusting severity) and then sweeps for deeper problems like auth logic flaws and cookie misconfigurations. This two-layer architecture means results are repeatable and predictable across scans, unlike pure AI reviews that can produce different findings each run.
CodeWatchdog inverts this hierarchy. It leads with Claude-powered AI scanning, then layers human senior engineer review on top. This catches subtle logic errors and architectural anti-patterns that rules miss, but the tradeoff is turnaround time: human reviews start at $499 versus Vibio's instant automated results. CodeWatchdog also works across languages, not just TypeScript and JavaScript.
Flarehawk operates at a completely different layer. Rather than analyzing source code, it ingests runtime telemetry from Cloudflare and builds a security graph that connects live requests, identities, and infrastructure changes. Its AI agents investigate incidents in context and produce remediation plans. Where Vibio catches vulnerabilities before deployment, Flarehawk catches attacks happening in production.
PromptBrake and EarlyCore both specialize in AI/LLM security, a domain Vibio does not address. PromptBrake runs black-box endpoint testing with real attack prompts, treating your AI as an opaque target. EarlyCore takes a white-box approach, scanning agent code pre-deployment and then monitoring runtime behavior. Neither analyzes general application code the way Vibio does.
Ethicore Guardian SDK sits inline as middleware, intercepting every request to your LLM and running three defense layers (pattern matching, semantic embeddings, behavioral inference) with zero cloud calls. This is runtime protection, not audit-time scanning. It complements rather than replaces a tool like Vibio.
Pricing Comparison
Vibio's pricing page lists the following plans:
Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.
| Vibio plan | Published price | Included scans | Support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full scan | £4.99 one-time payment | 1 comprehensive scan | Standard support |
| Subscription (4 scans/month) | £9.99/mo (£2.50 per scan) | 4 scans per month | Standard support |
| Subscription (20 scans/month) | £39.99/mo (£2.00 per scan) | 20 scans per month | Priority support |
All listed plans include full security reports and AI-assisted findings. This comparison does not list prices for the alternative tools, so it is not a like-for-like price comparison. Buyers should confirm which scan volume, billing term, and support level fit their expected usage.
When to Consider Switching
Vibio works well for JavaScript and TypeScript teams running production-readiness audits on Next.js, Express, NestJS, or Fastify applications. Its deterministic checks with file-level evidence are strong for catching missing auth middleware, input validation gaps, weak tsconfig settings, and absent CI pipelines. The Fix Packs feature, which clusters related findings into ordered remediation steps with Cursor prompts and PRs, streamlines the fix-it workflow.
But we see clear switching triggers. If your stack extends beyond JS/TS into Python, Go, Rust, or Java, Vibio cannot help with those codebases. CodeWatchdog covers broader language support. If you deploy LLM-powered features, Vibio has no checks for prompt injection, data leakage, or tool misuse; PromptBrake or EarlyCore fill that gap directly. If you need runtime threat detection rather than pre-deployment audits, Flarehawk's real-time telemetry analysis and autonomous investigation agents address a fundamentally different security layer.
Teams outgrowing Vibio's scope typically hit one of three walls: multi-language codebases where JS/TS-only coverage leaves blind spots, AI/LLM security requirements that Vibio does not address at all, or the need for continuous runtime monitoring rather than point-in-time scans. If you are shipping Supabase or Prisma applications exclusively in TypeScript and want repeatable, evidence-backed audits, Vibio remains a strong choice at its price point.
Migration Considerations
Moving from Vibio to any alternative requires understanding what you lose. Vibio's Fix Packs bundle related findings into actionable remediation clusters with step-by-step guidance, Cursor prompts, and PR templates. No other tool in this comparison offers that level of fix-it workflow integration. If your team relies on Fix Packs to drive sprint work, you will need to build your own triage process after migrating.
Vibio's deterministic-first architecture means your current scan results are reproducible. Before switching, we recommend running a final Vibio scan and exporting findings as your security baseline. Compare this against your new tool's first scan to identify coverage gaps in either direction.
For teams moving to CodeWatchdog, the transition is straightforward: paste code or connect your repo and receive a security score within 60 seconds. The free tier lets you validate coverage before committing. For Flarehawk, plan for a different integration model entirely: you will connect Cloudflare telemetry rather than scanning source code, so Flarehawk supplements rather than replaces code-level auditing. PromptBrake requires an API endpoint to test against, making it additive to your existing security tooling rather than a direct replacement.
One important note: Vibio uses read-only GitHub permissions and does not store your code, deleting the temporary workspace after each scan. Verify that any replacement tool offers equivalent data handling guarantees, especially if your organization has strict code residency requirements. CodeWatchdog similarly stores no code, while Flarehawk retains telemetry logs for up to 5 years depending on your tier.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Vibio support languages other than JavaScript and TypeScript? No. Vibio's 50+ deterministic checks are built for JavaScript and TypeScript frameworks including Next.js (App Router and Pages Router), NestJS, Express, and Fastify. It understands Supabase auth patterns, Prisma and Drizzle database layers, and Stripe webhook verification. If your codebase uses Python, Go, or other languages, you will need a different scanner like CodeWatchdog or a general-purpose SAST tool.
Can Vibio detect LLM and AI-specific vulnerabilities? No. Vibio focuses on web application security: auth, input validation, security headers, CORS, XSS, SQL injection, and CI/CD configuration. For AI-specific threats like prompt injection, data leakage, and jailbreaks, we recommend PromptBrake for endpoint testing or EarlyCore for runtime agent monitoring.
How does Vibio's Fix Packs feature compare to other tools' remediation guidance? Vibio groups findings into ordered Fix Packs prioritized by severity, with each pack including Cursor prompts and PR templates for step-by-step fixes. CodeWatchdog provides a PDF report with specific fixes and a 0-100 score. PromptBrake shows evidence logs with the exact attack prompt that succeeded. Vibio's approach is the most workflow-integrated of the group.
Is Vibio accurate enough to replace manual security audits? Vibio's deterministic checks produce zero false positives on rule-based findings since each one includes file path, line number, and code snippet evidence. The AI deep review layer can disagree with or adjust severity on findings, adding a second validation pass. For teams without dedicated security staff, this combination covers production-readiness gaps effectively, though it does not replace penetration testing or threat modeling for high-risk applications.
What is the difference between Vibio's URL scan and repo scan? The URL scan checks your public-facing app externally: security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), exposed API keys, rate limiting, CORS configuration, and auth surface analysis. The repo scan connects via read-only GitHub permissions and runs the full 50+ deterministic checks plus AI deep review with file-level evidence. URL scans require no repo access; repo scans provide comprehensive codebase analysis.
Can I use multiple security tools alongside Vibio? Yes, and we recommend it for comprehensive coverage. Vibio handles code-level production-readiness audits. Layer PromptBrake on top if you ship LLM features. Add Flarehawk for runtime threat detection and incident response. Use Ethicore Guardian SDK as inline middleware protecting your AI endpoints. Each tool operates at a different layer of the security stack with no overlap or conflict.