300+ Tools CoveredSource Data Updated Weeklydates

Best Lightstep (now ServiceNow Cloud Observability) Alternatives in 2026

Compare 3 reviewed substitutes for Lightstep (now ServiceNow Cloud Observability)

View Lightstep (now ServiceNow Cloud Observability) profile →

Top alternatives

Start with the strongest matches, then expand or search the complete category.

Honeycomb

Free tier · paid from $150/month

Honeycomb is the observability platform built for AI-era software. Fast queries, unified telemetry, and LLM observability. Used by Slack, Intercom, and Dropbox.

★ 58⬇ 19.5k

Datadog

From $15/host/month, billed annually

Cloud-scale monitoring and observability platform for infrastructure, apps, and logs.

★ 3.8k⬇ 12.8M📈 13

Dynatrace

Usage-based

Innovate faster, operate more efficiently, and drive better business outcomes with observability, AI, automation, and application security in one platform.

★ 227⬇ 27.7k📈 5

Cloud Observability is the ServiceNow documentation name for the product formerly known as Lightstep. Its documentation says the service is supported through March 1, 2026, or through the end of a customer subscription term when that is later. The same documentation describes workflows for logs, metrics, and traces: users can send data, query and visualize it, monitor and receive notifications, and collaborate in notebooks. It also documents the Service Graph Connector for OpenTelemetry for ServiceNow users and log ingestion through several tools.

This page compares documented capabilities rather than assigning a universal replacement. The available evidence does not establish a current public Lightstep price, a migration path, retention terms, query compatibility, or comparative product fit. Buyers should evaluate their required telemetry signals, integrations, deployment requirements, pricing unit, and subscription status against current vendor documentation.

Top Alternatives Overview

Elastic Observability documents an OpenTelemetry-first and Prometheus-native approach. Its observability material describes 550+ one-click integrations across clouds, CI/CD, databases, and other sources; log analytics with machine learning anomaly detection; monitoring for Kubernetes clusters, VM hosts, and cloud services; and APM distributed tracing across microservices and APIs. Elastic’s platform page also says deployment can be cloud, on-premises, or serverless. Elastic Cloud pricing describes hosted and serverless options, but Elastic's pricing page does not state a current public starting amount, currency, or term for Elastic Observability. Confirm the deployment model and workload basis before comparing costs.

New Relic describes an observability platform that brings telemetry, operational context, AI, and business data together. Its platform page lists 800+ pre-built integrations, enterprise-grade security and governance, contextual logs, an error inbox, and full-stack observability. The pricing page documents a free tier with one full platform user, unlimited basic users, 100 GB of data ingest per month, and default data retention of at least 8 days. That tier also lists capabilities including APM with distributed tracing, infrastructure monitoring, error tracking, digital experience monitoring, log management, serverless monitoring, and AIOps.

Datadog documents integrations, APM, logs, synthetics, RUM, network monitoring, dashboards, collaboration, alerts, APIs, and security. Its product material says integrations aggregate metrics and events across the DevOps stack, while its alerting material covers metric alerts for an individual host or a cluster and notifications through email, PagerDuty, Slack, and other channels. The vendor's pricing page gives a product-specific example for GPU Monitoring: starting at $20 per active GPU device per month. It does not establish a general platform starting price.

Dynatrace documents Smartscape for automatically identifying and mapping relationships between applications and underlying infrastructure, Grail for contextual analysis, OpenPipeline stream processing, OneAgent collection, and PurePath distributed-trace context. Its pricing page describes one annual platform-level commitment, transparent rate-card drawdown, and real-time consumption visibility. For Real User Monitoring, the vendor's pricing page lists $2.25 per 1,000 sessions. That rate is specific to Real User Monitoring and should not be treated as the price of the entire platform.

Architecture and Approach Comparison

Cloud Observability documentation presents a workflow spanning logs, metrics, and traces. It includes dashboards for visualizing and monitoring these signals, plus steps to send data, query and visualize it, monitor and receive notifications, and collaborate in notebooks. Its Service Graph Connector is documented for sending data to ServiceNow with OpenTelemetry. The official documentation does not define a product architecture beyond these documented workflows, so it does not establish claims about change intelligence, portability, specific deployment modes, or a preferred use case.

The alternatives document distinct capabilities. Elastic describes a unified platform for documents, vectors, logs, and metrics, with one schema and one query language; its observability offering describes OpenTelemetry and Prometheus support. New Relic describes a unified data layer and 800+ pre-built integrations. Datadog documents monitoring and instrumentation integrations, cross-stack aggregation of metrics and events, and alerts for hosts or clusters. Dynatrace documents Smartscape topology mapping, Grail storage and contextual analysis, OpenPipeline processing, OneAgent collection, and PurePath traces.

These descriptions identify product capabilities, not like-for-like feature parity. A technical evaluation should verify the required telemetry inputs, query behavior, dashboards, notifications, identity controls, data retention, and any ServiceNow integration before a replacement decision.

Pricing Comparison

The vendor's pricing page does not list a current public price for Cloud Observability (formerly Lightstep). Its documentation provides an end-of-life support date—March 1, 2026, or the subscription term end date if later—but does not state a plan name, price, currency, billing term, included data allowance, user allowance, or quote process. Buyers with an existing subscription should confirm the applicable subscription term and commercial terms directly from their agreement.

Scroll sideways to see all columns. With a keyboard, focus this table and use the arrow keys.

ProductDisclosed pricing informationWhat the pricing page does not state
Cloud ObservabilityNo current public price is listed in the public documentation.Plan, currency, term, allowance, and pricing process.
New RelicIncludes 100 GB of free data ingest per month. Original data ingest beyond that allowance is $0.40/GB; Data Plus is $0.60/GB beyond the allowance. The monthly user-cost table lists Core users at $49/user.A total bill without the selected edition, user types, ingest option, data volume and any additional compute or retention requirements.
DatadogGPU Monitoring starts at $20 per active GPU device per month.A general observability-platform price or a price for other modules.
DynatraceReal User Monitoring: $2.25 per 1,000 sessions; platform pricing uses one annual commitment.A total platform cost without selected capabilities and consumption.
Grafana CloudApplication Observability Pro starts at $0.025 per host hour ($18/host); the platform fee is $19 per month and includes 50 GB ingested per month, 30 days retention, and 8×5 email support.Whether those application-observability terms cover a buyer’s full intended workload.
CoralogixOne unit represents $1.50 worth of logs, metrics and traces across its data pipelines. Units are based on data-ingest volume; unlimited users and unlimited hosts are included.A total bill without data volume and the chosen data pipelines; the unit value alone is not a per-GB rate.

Do not compare these figures as equivalent entry prices. They use different bases: monthly telemetry allowances, host hours, active GPU devices, sessions, annual commitments, and ingest-volume units. Confirm the exact product module, usage measure, included retention, support level, currency, billing cadence, and commitment before estimating a purchase.

When to Consider Switching

A review is timely when Cloud Observability support timing or an organization’s required workflows need confirmation. The documented support boundary is March 1, 2026, unless a subscription term ends later. Start by documenting the current use of logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, notifications, notebooks, log ingestion tools, and the Service Graph Connector for OpenTelemetry. Those are the functions directly documented in the Cloud Observability documentation.

Evaluate alternatives against requirements rather than a generalized recommendation. Elastic documents OpenTelemetry-first and Prometheus-native observability, 550+ one-click integrations, log analytics, Kubernetes and VM monitoring, and APM tracing. New Relic documents a free tier with 100 GB monthly ingest and at least 8 days of default retention, along with APM, infrastructure monitoring, logs, and digital experience monitoring. Datadog documents infrastructure, APM, logs, synthetics, RUM, network monitoring, dashboards, alerts, and security. Dynatrace documents Smartscape, Grail, OpenPipeline, OneAgent, and PurePath.

A switch decision should therefore be based on validated signal coverage, integration needs, retention, access controls, operational workflows, deployment requirements, and commercial terms. The public documentation does not support a claim that any one alternative is best for a team size, industry, migration scenario, or existing technology stack.

Migration Considerations

Begin with an inventory of the Cloud Observability functions in use: logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, monitors and notifications, notebooks, log-ingestion tools, and any Service Graph Connector for OpenTelemetry workflow. Record the data sources, current alert behavior, dashboard definitions, access model, retention requirements, and subscription end date. Cloud Observability documentation establishes that these signal types and workflows exist, but the public documentation does not establish export formats, query-language compatibility, dashboard portability, alert-rule portability, retention migration, or a supported migration procedure.

Target-specific validation remains necessary. Elastic documents OpenTelemetry-first and Prometheus-native ingestion plus 550+ integrations; New Relic documents capabilities including APM distributed tracing, infrastructure monitoring, logs, and serverless monitoring; Datadog documents integrations and alerts; Dynatrace documents OneAgent, OpenPipeline, Smartscape, and PurePath. These descriptions can guide an evaluation checklist, but they do not prove that existing Cloud Observability configuration can be moved unchanged.

Run a controlled validation using representative logs, metrics, and traces. Compare collection, query and visualization behavior, notification routing, access controls, retention, and cost measurement against the documented target terms. Maintain the existing service while confirming the replacement workflow. Because the pinned evidence does not state data or configuration portability, do not assume that OpenTelemetry use alone preserves dashboards, alerts, historical data, or operating procedures.

Lightstep (now ServiceNow Cloud Observability) Alternatives FAQ

What alternatives can be evaluated alongside Cloud Observability (formerly Lightstep)?

The vendors' documentation describes observability capabilities for Elastic, New Relic, Datadog, Dynatrace, Grafana Cloud, and Coralogix. It does not support ranking them or naming a universally best alternative. Compare the documented telemetry signals, integrations, workflow requirements, deployment model, retention, and commercial terms against the Cloud Observability functions in use.

What does the Cloud Observability documentation say about support timing?

Cloud Observability documentation states that the service is supported through March 1, 2026, or through the customer subscription term end date when that is later. The official documentation does not state current public pricing, plan names, or a migration process.

What Cloud Observability workflows should be reviewed before a change?

The documentation describes logs, metrics, traces, dashboards, querying and visualization, monitoring and notifications, notebooks, log ingestion with several tools, and the Service Graph Connector for OpenTelemetry. Review which of these workflows are in use, along with dashboards, notifications, access controls, retention requirements, and subscription terms.

Is there a like-for-like public price comparison with Cloud Observability?

No. The Cloud Observability documentation lists no current public price, currency, billing term, allowance, or plan. The alternatives use different disclosed measures: New Relic lists 100 GB of free monthly ingest, Datadog lists $20 per active GPU device per month for GPU Monitoring, Dynatrace lists $2.25 per 1,000 RUM sessions, Grafana lists host-hour pricing, and Coralogix uses ingest-volume units.

Does OpenTelemetry establish that a migration will be simple?

No. Cloud Observability documents a Service Graph Connector for OpenTelemetry, and Elastic describes OpenTelemetry-first observability, but the public documentation does not establish compatibility for queries, dashboards, alerts, historical data, retention, or configuration export. Validate those items with representative telemetry and workflows before changing services.

Explore More

Comparisons